Skip to main content
Home
  • Clinical Outcome Assessments
    Clinical Outcome Assessments

    What are Clinical Outcome Assessments (COAs)? What do they measure?

    Learn more about COAs
    hero_1.jpeg
    The most trusted distributor of COAs

    700+ exclusive COA distributions on behalf of their copyright owners

    hero_2.jpeg
    PROQOLID™: the largest COA database

    7,000+ COAs described in details and accessible in this unique database

  • Services
    Services

    Mapi Research Trust provides turnkey solutions for your Clinical Outcome Assessments (COAs) strategies - including COA databases, targeted literature reviews, licensing.

    Read More
    COA Databases Patient-Centered Endpoint Intelligence COA Licensing Translation and Linguistic Validation eCOA Licensing COA Repository
    hero_3.jpeg
    About ePROVIDE™

    Online access to all our services and COA databases

    hero_2_2.jpeg
    What are eBooklets?

    Find out more about this step-by-step guidance for valid digitization of COAs

  • Author Collaboration
    Author Collaboration

    Our team is dedicated to assisting authors in the daily management of their questionnaires and all derivatives, including translations and electronic versions

    Read More
    COA distribution COA copyright and protection Promotion of COAs and developers Testimonials
    hero_3_1.jpeg
    Catalog of COAs distributed by Mapi Research Trust

    800+ exclusive distributions of COAs, accessible in ePROVIDE

  • Resources
    Resources

    ACCESS all our resources on COAs and eCOA: webinars, publications, blogs. SUBSCRIBE to receive email updates.

    Read More
    Blog Publications Useful links Webinar recordings Whitepapers
    Whitepaper-Digitizing-COAs.jpg
    New whitepaper

    Digitizing COAs: A streamlined approach to approval

    hero_4_2.jpeg
    New whitepaper

    COAs and copyright: How to mitigate risks of infringement and misuse in clinical research and practice

  • News & Events
    News & Events

    Stay informed with our latest news and check all our upcoming events. SUBSCRIBE to get email updates.

    Read More
    hero_5_1.jpeg
    News
    Hero_5_2.jpeg
    Conferences
    Hero_5_3.jpeg
    Webinars
  • About us
    About us

    Mapi Research Trust is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving patients’ quality of life by facilitating access to Clinical Outcome Assessments(COAs).

    Read More
    hero_6_1.jpeg
    Team

    A global team of multi-disciplinary experts

    hero_6_2.jpeg
    Experience

    Collecting & Processing Patient Centered Outcomes information for more than two decades

  • Contact
  1. Home
  2. News & Events
  3. News
  4. The Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Consortium at the Critical Path Institute (C-Path)

The Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Consortium at the Critical Path Institute (C-Path)

 

Linda Nelsen, MHS1, Michelle Mocarski, MPH2

1 GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, PA, USA; 2 Forest Research Institute, Jersey City, NJ, USA, Co-chairs of the PRO Consortium’s Asthma Working Group (on behalf of the Asthma Working Group)

The Asthma Working Group (WG) aims to obtain FDA qualification of a self-reported symptom diary for adults and adolescents with a diagnosis of mild to severe persistent asthma. The diary is intended for use as a co- primary or secondary endpoint in clinical trials aimed at establishing treatment benefit of asthma therapies. Participants in the WG include representatives from 11 PRO Consortium member firms, C-Path, and Adelphi Values. A panel of clinical experts provided advice at key points during the research process.
The WG completed a review of prior qualitative research which showed asthma was characterized by three core symptom domains: breathing symptoms (e.g., difficulty breathing, shortness of breath, wheezing), chest symptoms (e.g., tightness, pressure, pain), and cough-related symptoms (e.g., cough, mucus/phlegm).
The symptoms identified in the qualitative research are consistent with current guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. A critical review of existing asthma symptom measures determined that none of them adequately assessed all of the core symptoms, which led to a decision to develop a new symptom diary.
To complement the findings from the literature, individual interviews were conducted with a sample of 55 participants to elicit both spontaneous and probed responses regarding their experience with asthma. Including a range of asthma severities, all participants had experienced asthma symptoms within three weeks of the interviews. Consistent with previous findings, the same core symptoms emerged. Based on these findings and input from clinical experts, draft items were developed and tested through three rounds of cognitive interviews.
The preliminary version of the measure, the Asthma Daily Symptom Diary (ADSD), includes nine items covering three symptom domains (i.e., breathing, chest, and cough). The ADSD is designed for completion in the morning and evening to capture variability of symptoms throughout a 24-hour period. Planned quantitative research will evaluate item function, test-retest reliability, and concurrent construct validity to inform further refinement of the ADSD prior to submission for initial FDA qualification as an exploratory endpoint measure.

In this section
In this section
  • News
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Webinars
Site Branding
    ICON plc
  • Contact
  • About Us
For Clients
  • Services
  • Resources
  • ePROVIDE™
News & Events
  • News
  • Conferences
  • Webinars
Socials
  • Linkedin

Legal Footer

  • © 2025 Mapi Research Trust
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy
How can we help?
  • All
Popular search terms:
  • COVID-19
  • Site & Patient Recruitment
  • Oncology
  • Medical Device
  • Real World Evidence
  • Decentralised & hybrid clinical trials
  • Digital Disruption